The unit of time that we want to use can be converted directly into the 50-minute model and the lesson table remains unchanged.
· The teaching day must become more balanced as regards composition and length.
We are currently investigating the feasibility of a 75-minute schedule, which will allow far more variety in teaching methods during the
lessons. Also, we think that the most important benefits are: fewer starts during the day for both students and teachers, few lesson
changes, a calmer school, and a more compact teaching day.
A major objective is to make a better link in the lower school to the methods of working in primary education. That can be done by
means of fewer subjects per period and by a greater role for the mentor as a coach. In the senior forms, we want to prepare them
gradually for an increasing responsibility for their own learning process, because that is a significant factor for success in higher
education (HBO and university). The majority of our students go on to higher education.
Changes in the Rules and Regulations
During the next two years the basic curriculum will be drastically updated, and there are going to be very many adjustments to the
second phase. But prior to that, and in anticipation of those developments, we want to have our teaching model adapted before we
have to start working on syllabus changes.
Changes in Funding
In the current economic and political climate, there is some talk of cutbacks and huge financial risks for schools. The economic climate
hits us all the harder, as it also results in a drop in the number of students in the international department. Many schools try to find a
way out by cutting back on lesson time per subject, by forming larger groups or limiting choices, but we feel that we could work more
efficiently with a model in which not all school-bound teaching time is spent in the form of group tuition. We are aiming for a decrease,
by natural wastage, of 10% in the formation.